Why should I consult instructions from outside my circuit?
Not all circuits have pattern instructions. If your circuit does not have pattern instructions, it is obviously beneficial to look at how each circuit views your theory of the case, and to pick the language that best presents your client's view.
Even circuits with pattern instructions may miss statutes or subjects covered in other circuits.
If your circuit's instructions are several years old, they may not address the latest legal developments (e.g., new legislation or a new Supreme Court decision).
A topic treated in a cursory manner in your circuit might be the subject of an extended, well-reasoned annotation in another circuit, and suggest a claim or defense that had not occurred to you.
You won't know until you have looked at every circuit. That's why they are
all collected here.
The trialdex search boxes on the front page and the
jury instructions links page work by sending your queries to Google, where documents containing the search term are displayed on a results page. You may need to use Ctrl F (find in page) to locate your search term after opening the target document.
Some courts do not post instructions on the Internet, so those instructions will not be picked up by the search engine. Also, although the trialdex queries attempt to screen out documents that are not jury instructions, some documents that are not instructions may show up in the results.
This is, therefore, an imprecise tool, but a helpful one.
Keeping current with new or amended instructions is a challenge, since the courts post the changes without any notice. So I check the federal sites for changes every week. Keeping up with state changes is a bit problematic, but links for checking them are posted here.
When I see a federal update, I detail the changes on the trialdex
jury instruction blog, and email jury instruction alerts to anyone who has
signed up for them. This is a free service, and that list is not used for any other purpose.
Note that subscription sites like Westlaw and Lexis are much more casual about updates; they can take months (sometimes over a year) to post new or modified federal instructions.
No matter which service you use, it is good practice to double check the official sites
(conveniently linked here) before citing a pattern instruction.
Can I sign up to be notified when instructions are revised?
Yes. Send an email request to email@example.com to receive free jury instruction email alerts whenever a federal circuit adds or revises a pattern jury instruction. The email will link expert commentary in the trialdex
jury instruction blog with, where helpful, a redline/strikeout view of the changes.
Your email address will be stored offline, and will not be used for any other purpose. All emails will come with an "opt out" link.
What is the trialdex federal crimes statute tracker?
The trialdex Federal Crimes Statute Tracker displays a visual history of United States Code provisions that describe commonly charged federal felonies. It works like the "versions" feature on Westlaw, with the addition of a redline/strikeout view of the precise changes.
Trialdex litigation tools may be used to spot issues and identify important authority (rules, statutes, Supreme Court cases). They are intended to replicate the organized thinking process of a legal expert. They are accompanied by infographics, but the Q&A format permits explanations of the legal terms that would not fit in the chart.
For example, the infographic for the lawful interrogation tool
can be viewed by clicking on the image on the right, but there is no room on the chart for definitions of the legal terms (e.g., "custody" or "interrogation") or case citations. That information is available in the Q&As.
No, they are not, and they do not create an attorney-client relationship with the reader. The suggested answers are the beginning of your legal research, not the end. This should be self-evident, since trialdex tools are functionally similar to any secondary legal resource (just a bit smarter). A trialdex tool will give you a suggested issue or result, and a case or other authority to use in continuing with conventional research.
It should be noted that the answers are based on federal law, and do not directly address state constitutions or statutes. But federal authority is often persuasive in state litigation (state rules tend to be modeled on federal rules).
I do. There are no third-party ads, pop ups, cookies, tracing, or any hidden method of generating income. I don't solicit or accept donations. The site is completely free.
That being said, I have a couple of suggestions of ways that you can show your appreciation:
Link my site. If you have a Web page, blog, or some similar presence on the Internet, please link my site.
Buy my books. I have written a couple of books:
360 Federal Crimes and
A Detective's Guide to
Interrogation Law. Take a moment to click on the links and use the Amazon "look inside" feature to get a sense of the quality of the content. The books are reasonably priced (especially the Kindle editions), and the reviews have been favorable. If you decide to purchase a copy, please consider taking a few minutes to post an Amazon review.